Friday, February 25, 2011

Google and Bing know what you friends think

The search engines are tracking what gets tweeted and "liked" on Facebook.

Do you like search results with friend connections?

Posted via email from Warren Whitlock's Best Seller Book Marketing Posterous

Labels: , , , ,

Add to Onlywire

Tuesday, February 01, 2011

Google Shows Bing Is Cheating, Copying Search Results

Here's a fun tale of Google engineers running a sting operation on Microsoft

Posted via email from Warren Whitlock's Best Seller Book Marketing Posterous

Labels: , , , ,

Add to Onlywire

Monday, December 13, 2010

How does Google rank locations?

Tags, boost, places, boost

Lot's of new terms to keep track of... so Google tells us how they rank results

Relevance – results that categorically match what has been searched

Prominence – results that are “well known, trusted” and show solid data from other sources on the web

Distance – results that are near your search criteria or known location

Posted via email from Warren Whitlock's Best Seller Book Marketing Posterous

Labels: , , , ,

Add to Onlywire

Thursday, December 02, 2010

Is $6 Billion for #Groupon a Great Deal? (thanks @seosteve)

Andrew Mason, Groupon’s founder and chief executive, says his strategy is “finding the holy grail of local.”

Amplify’d from dealbook.nytimes.com

As investors fret that Google’s $6 billion bid for Groupon is too high a price to pay, new details about the company’s sales and growth suggest that it might be more like one of Groupon’s cut-rate deals.

An individual close to Groupon, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the company’s annual revenue is running in excess of $1 billion a year and its subscriber base tripled this summer, to 35 million users.

And an analyst at Barclays Capital, Douglas Anmuth, estimated in a research report released on Tuesday that sales could hit $1.5 billion in 2011.

At those levels, Google would be paying four times next year’s revenues. In contrast, the company paid $3.1 billion, or roughly 10 times sales, for DoubleClick in 2007. It bought YouTube for $1.65 billion in 2006, when the online video hub was making less than $11 million a year, according to a company filing.

Andrew Mason
See more at dealbook.nytimes.com

Posted via email from Warren Whitlock's Best Seller Book Marketing Posterous

Labels: , , , ,

Add to Onlywire

Saturday, November 13, 2010

Old Media Faux Pax of the Day:

To view this post with the advice that interstitial pages will keep you from being seen, you first have to view an interstitial page.

Amplify’d from www.fastcompany.com

Try to avoid interstitial pages, ad pop-ups, or other elements that interfere with your content. In some cases, these distracting elements may be picked up in the preview of your page, making the screenshots less attractive.

See more at www.fastcompany.com

Posted via email from Warren Whitlock's Best Seller Book Marketing Posterous

Labels: , , , ,

Add to Onlywire

Saturday, October 30, 2010

The Future Of Facebook - Forbes.com

Labels: , , , ,

Add to Onlywire

Sunday, August 08, 2010

Google Is for Pandas, Facebook Is for Lobsters

Amplify’d from googlewatch.eweek.com
Google Is for Pandas, Facebook Is for Lobsters

Adam Rifkin, co-founder of social app site Renkoo, said Google, with its search and other task specific, goal-oriented applications, fosters grazing of information. Rifkin wrote:

Adam Rifkin, co-founder of social app site Renkoo, said Google, with its search and other task specific, goal-oriented applications, fosters grazing of information. Rifkin wrote:

The kind of application that Google knows how to make well are the kind that embody a panda's "eats, shoots and leaves" model of Internet behavior. Pandas spend every waking hour foraging -- aka searching -- and consuming. The most successful Google applications serve such a utilitarian mandate, too: they encourage users to search for something, consume and move onto the next thing. Get in, do your business, get out. Do a Google search, slurp down information, move on. Pull up Google maps or Gmail or Google news, do something, leave. Where Google does not excel is in making applications that are by their nature for lingering and luxuriating -- the so-called social applications.

Facebook, Foursquare, Twitter and Quora are the lobster traps that catch millions of consumers and make them stay.

Facebook is a lobster trap and your friends are the bait. On social networks we are all lobsters, and lobsters just wanna have fun. Every time a friend shares a status, a link, a like, a comment, or a photo, Facebook has more bait to lure me back. Facebook is literally filled with master baiters: Whenever I return to Facebook I am barraged with information about many friends, to encourage me to stick around and click around. Every time I react with a like or comment, or put a piece of content in, I'm serving as Facebook bait myself. Facebook keeps our friends as hostages, so although we can check out of Hotel Facebook any time we like, we can never leave. So we linger. And we lurk. And we luxuriate. The illogical extreme of content-as-bait are the Facebook games where the content is virtual bullshit. Social apps are lobster traps; Google apps do not bait users with their friends.

Of course, Google users still use Facebook and Facebook users still use Google. But at the end of the day, they provide two different, but overlapping toolsets.

Read more at googlewatch.eweek.com

Posted via email from Warren Whitlock's Best Seller Book Marketing Posterous

Labels: , , , ,

Add to Onlywire